Archive for the ‘National’ Category

Australian government’s hypocrisy on “consultation” about mining in Woomera

May 18, 2013

Government’s “consultation” on mining in Woomera more like a ram raid Australian Greens nuclear policy spokesperson Senator Scott Ludlam.  17 May 2013The Federal Government made a mockery of public consultation by allowing three working days for initial submissions on opening up the Woomera Prohibited Area to miners, Greens Senator Scott Ludlam said today.

“On Wednesday 8 May Defence Minister Stephen Smith and resources Minister Gary Gray released the draft exposure of legislation to increase access to Woomera Prohibited Area to miners, and three working days later on 13 May the submission period closed.  It’s not good enough,” said Senator Ludlam.

“Lawyers representing the Maralinga people, who in addition to being the Traditional Owners own approximately 40,000sqkm of freehold land in the area, advise that they have not been consulted on this legislation despite approaching the Defence Minister on the issue in July 2011.

“It is a relatively short amendment at nine pages but it is high-impact legislation. This area has an estimated 78 per cent of Australia’s known uranium reserves.  The implications are massive.

“After years of review and the production of an 82 page report, we do not want to see a long process brought to an abrupt and shallow end.”

Problem of old dead reactor and radioactive trash at Lucas Heights, Sydney

May 16, 2013

Nuclear waste on the move in clean-up  http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/nuclear-waste-on-the-move-in-cleanup-20130515-2jmu5.html#ixzz2TV9sbj00  May 16, 2013 Heath Aston  Radioactive waste and parts of Australia’s oldest nuclear reactor will be trucked out of Sydney under plans to clean up the Lucas Heights nuclear facility and develop a national hazardous-waste dump in the outback.

But residents in Sydney’s south are concerned at the prospect of having radioactivematerial transported past their homes.

They believe the dismantling and removal of the 1960s-era ”high-flux Australian reactor” and spent fuel rods is a bid to clear the way for further development at Lucas Heights and the production of more dangerous waste.

The plan to move the retired reactor, switched on by former prime minister Robert Menzies in 1958 and taken out of service in 2007, emerged in the budget papers.

The Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, which manages Lucas Heights, has been given $28.7 million to prepare for the move. The four-year funding package will pay for ”pre-disposal conditioning of existing radioactive waste in preparation for long-term storage and disposal, and for the clean-up of buildings and infrastructure containing hazardous materials” at Lucas Heights.

Separately, the government has put $35.7 million into securing a site to become the nation’s repository for radioactive material. It will host waste from Lucas Heights and may provide the state government with a destination for contaminated soil from the former uranium smelter site at Hunters Hill.

An area at Muckaty, 800 kilometres south of Darwin, is the government’s preferred site after it struck an agreement with the Northern Land Council. But development of the semi-arid claypan site is bogged down in a legal challenge by some traditional owners. The budget papers do not identify Muckaty specifically, but a spokesman for Resources and Energy Minister Gary Gray said Muckaty, 100 kilometres north of Tennant Creek, remained the only location under consideration.

Within four years a facility that could centralise waste from Lucas Heights, and 100 or so other industrial and medical waste facilities, would be ready for construction. An ANSTO spokesman confirmed the plan to move the reactor and waste. The load will include fuel rods due to arrive in Botany Bay for transportation back to Lucas Heights after they were reprocessed at a nuclear facility in France.

Local resident groups who supported a previous plan to encase the reactor in concrete will meet ANSTO management in Engadine in the next few days.

Australia’s uranium miners will scream about Budget closing down exploration rorts

May 15, 2013

The mining industry  has  had  a royal run from the Australian government.  Up until this latest Federal Budget uranium mining companies could deduct the full cost of exploration immediately, or even 150 per cent of the cost of exploration in some cases. Tax breaks on exploration and equipment cost taxpayers more than $1 billion per year.

Now – mining companies will cry poor, as the new budget contains  measures to tighten the rules on exploration deductions for miners. Companies will now only be able to deduct genuine exploration spending, rather than writing off the acquisition of a company that acquired mining rights and spent money on exploration. But hey, the Government is sacking  more than 100 staff from the federal environment department, staff who help assess mining proposals

But don’t let’s feel too sorry for the uranium, or indeed, any mining corporations. For example BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto pay tax on their fuel, but the government gives nearly all of it back through the Fuel Tax Credits program. Fears the diesel fuel rebates could be targeted again proved unfounded, with no direct changes to the 32 cent rebate.

As Charles  Berge wrote (in Sydney Morning Herald May 11, 2010)    “And then there are direct government services. Geoscience Australia’s annual budget is $130 million, much of which goes to providing free data and services to the mining industry. The CSIRO and various government research centres chip in another $130 million per year in benefits to the industry. And for the research the miners have to do themselves, they get $160 million back per year in the form of research and development tax concessions.

A billion or two for fuel, … a billion for free pollution and a couple of hundred million for subsidised science . . . pretty soon we’re talking real money.

And that’s before we’ve even begun to talk about government-provided roads, rail, ports, electricity networks and other infrastructure.

 Mining is different from most other industries because it directly accesses publicly owned, non-renewable resources. It is appropriate that it pay for this privileged access, over and above its fair share of company tax. In light of the $4 billion to $5 billion in benefits the mining industry receives each year from the Australian taxpayer, the government’s proposed resource rent tax starts to look modest (and anyway, uranium mining was exempt from that tax)….. 

So don’t be snowed by the big miners’ shrieks about sovereign risk driving them out of Australia. The biggest risk is that we continue to subsidise mining operations that aren’t paying a fair return for their use of public resources and taxpayer dollars.”

Nuclear funding in Australia’s Federal Budget 2013

May 15, 2013
  •    Nuke Dump – $35.7m over 4 years    National Radioactive Waste Management — securing a site and First Stage business case   to “secure suitable volunteer site” and undertake initial scoping and design work, establish a Regional Consultative Committee and First State business case. (p253 bp2)
  •   Counsellor in New Delhi  - $3.1m over 4 years to continue posting a Resources, Energy and Tourism Counsellor in New Delhi – is this to do with Uranium??

 

  •  ANSTO = $38.7m for decommissioning High Flux Nuclear Reactor and $8.1 m for increasing costs of running OPAL Nuclear Reactor  (nuclear fuel and electricity) Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation — additional funding for decommissioning and nuclear waste management activities

 

 ARPANSA = $ 7.8 m over four years   Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency — improving Australia’s capacity to deliver effective radiation protection and nuclear safety   to enhance capacity to issue new licences and undertake compliance, upgrade Yallambie and to address workplace health and safety issues.  5.1 m to be recovered through revising licencing fees and testing fees.

  •        Rum Jungle radioactive decontamination  funds = 1.5 this year.

 

More detail on these nuclear-related expenses in the  Budget: (more…)

A new force in Australian politics – the Small Solar Power lobby

May 14, 2013

Solar Citizens Officially Launches Today http://www.energymatters.com.au/index.php?main_page=news_article&article_id=3736 by Energy Matters, 14 May 13 Solar Citizens aims to bring together existing and future solar owners in Australia and to help see solar installed on every suitable rooftop in the nation.  The project is an offshoot of 100% Renewable;  a non-partisan organisation established to help move Australia towards a renewable energy future.

While the solar revolution is well under way and millions of systems have been installed in Australia; there are some dark clouds on the horizon. ”But despite the many reasons to go solar, some big energy companies don’t want to see Australians take back control of their own energy needs. They want to make connecting to solar harder, not easier,” says part of a statement on the Solar Citizens web site.

According to Solar Citizens, Australians have invested $8 billion so far in small scale solar power systems.
Calculations performed by national solar provider Energy Matters estimate that collectively, the 1 million plus solar panel arrays in the nation will generate around $913 million worth of electricity (retail value) over the next 12 months – making these households a threat to Big Energy in Australia.

Solar Citizens says it will strive to protect the rights of solar households, lobbying to ensure they are treated with respect and paid a fair price for the power they contribute to the mains grid. With potentially nearly 2 million households as participants including solar hot water system owners; the group could become a powerful voice.

Solar Citizens’ first two campaigns focus on looming issues in Tasmania and Queensland. The Queensland campaign highlights concerns regarding a proposal from the Queensland Competition Authority to move solar power owners on to a different electricity billing system that could see increased charges for solar households.

The campaign for Tasmania is in relation to the privatising Aurora’s electricity retailer arm, to occur in January 2014. There are fears that as a result, solar feed-in tariffs could be slashed. Both campaigns involve petitions that will be presented to relevant authorities.

Unsafe, unwise, for Australia to put interests of small industry, uranium, ahead of public good, in Middle East sales

May 13, 2013

The UAE is a collection of seven emirates including Abu Dhabi and Dubai and has one of the least participatory political systems in the world. In the most recent national election in 2006, only 6889 people – less than 1 per cent of the population were entitled to vote, and they were hand-picked by the national rulers.

The uranium sale treaty currently before the Federal Parliament’s joint standing committee on treaties, states that the agreement “shall remain in force for an initial period of thirty years

The treaty would lock us in to supply uranium to the UAE irrespective of political changes or upheavals in the region

Think again, minister, on uranium deal with Emirates http://www.smh.com.au/comment/think-again-minister-on-uranium-deal-with-emirates-20130513-2jh5d.html#ixzz2TDVaKzxm May 13, 2013   Dave Sweeney 

It might surprise many Australians to know that Foreign Minister Bob Carr is moving forward with a deal to sell Australian uranium to the United Arab Emirates – a country with an illiberal government situated in one of the most volatile and insecure regions in the world. (more…)

No business case for nuclear power in Australia, yet Energy Minister spouts the nuclear lobby line

May 11, 2013

Senator Ludlam noted that Labor Party policy is opposed to nuclear power in Australia and that South Australian energy minister, Labor’s Tom Koutsantonis said nuclear power in Australia is not commercially viable.

“In Europe, Japan and the United States nuclear power is in retreat. 150 nuclear power stations in Europe alone are scheduled for closure. The world uranium price has collapsed from almost $US140 a pound in 2007 to just over $US40 today because nuclear is on the way out.

“Australia is blessed with perfect conditions for renewable energy generation

Minister’s loyalty to the mining industry warps his vision of nuclear power http://tonyserve.wordpress.com/2013/05/03/australia-ministers-loyalty-to-the-mining-industry-warps-his-vision-of-nuclear-power-senatorludlam/ 3 May 2013“Gary Gray’s loyalty to the mining industry has blinded him to the fact nuclear power in Australia makes no economic or environmental sense,” Greens Senator Scott Ludlam said after the energy minister voiced support for a local nuclear power sector.

“The energy minister’s declared optimism that nuclear power generation ‘issues’ will ‘be attended to in a timely fashion’ is unfounded. Nuclear power generation’s ‘issues’ are fundamental and inextricable: the only way to avoid them is to avoid nuclear power completely.

“While the case against nuclear power anywhere in the world is strong, the idea of a nuclear power sector in Australia is particularly ridiculous. There is no business case for it whatsoever and that will remain the case. (more…)

No, Australian uranium companies do NOT pay much in taxes and royalties

May 9, 2013

AUSTRALIA’S URANIUM EXPORT REVENUE IN PERSPECTIVE  YELLOWCAKE FEVER Exposing the Uranium Industry’s Economic Myths , Australian Conservation Foundation “……BHP Billiton enjoys extensive subsidies in the  form of fuel-tax credits (formerly known as diesel  fuel rebates). Under the mine expansion plan, the  company would have enjoyed $350 million in diesel  fuel rebates over five years – more than was to  be paid to the State in royalties from the existing  underground mine over the same period – and an  effective subsidy of $85 million annually to 2050.

A 2012 Australia Institute report found that at a time  when the mining industry is earning record profits,  it received subsidies and concessions worth more  than $4 billion per year from the Federal Government alone. The biggest single subsidy comes in the form
of fuel-tax credits, valued at $1.9 billion in 2009/10

Uranium mining companies – and the Australian Uranium Association – fought the proposed Resources  Super Profits Tax in 2010. Ross Gittins wrote in The Age in February 2013: “Last year the mining industry  accounted for more than a fifth of all the profit made  in Australia, even though it had a much smaller  share of the economy. This was mainly because  the royalties charged by the state governments  failed to capture enough of the market value of the  minerals the largely foreign-owned miners were being  permitted to extract.

When the Rudd government tried  to correct this with a resource super profits tax, the  industry set out to bring about its electoral defeat.”

Uranium was to be included in the proposed  Resource Super Profit Tax, but it was subsequently  excluded from the Minerals Resource Rent Tax. A 2011 report by the Australia Institute notes  that the average rate of corporate tax paid by  the mining industry in 2008/09 was 13.9% –  substantially below the theoretical 30%…..”http://www.acfonline.org.au/sites/default/files/resources/ACF_Yellowcake_Fever.pdf

Australia’s mainstream media hides the nasty truth about the uranium market

May 8, 2013
 the media hasn’t responded at all. In March 2013, Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics reduced its mid-term forecast for uranium revenue by nearly half, and the media was silent. The Australian Conservation Foundation released a detailed, factual report on April 26 exposing the uranium industry’s economic misinformation, and the media was silent.
the economic benefits are grossly overstated (and amplified and regurgitated) and contrary facts are ignored.
Uranium – fool’s oil  http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2013/5/7/climate/uranium-fools-oil#ixzz2SlerByPC  

In the mid-2000s, uranium was the ‘new black’ as The Bulletin put it and investors could take their pick in this “radioactive heaven”. The number of listed uranium juniors doubled, and doubled again … and again and again.

A company sent radioactive drill samples for assay and quickly became the most traded stock on the ASX (leading to a suspension of share trading). Residents of the small Pacific Island Niue were surprised to learn from an Australian company that they might be sitting on 10 per cent of the world’s uranium, and surprised again when the project was abandoned two months later − easy come, easy go. The uranium spot price increased ten-fold and more, peaking at $US138/lb in June 2007.

Michael Angwin, the Australian Uranium Association’s Executive Director, said in 2008 that Australia “has enough reserves to be to uranium what Saudi Arabia is to oil.” Only a pedant would note that Saudi oil generates 466 times as much revenue as Australian uranium (and that most of ‘our’ uranium revenue never comes anywhere near Australia because of the high level of foreign ownership).

Politicians from the major parties have been only too happy to regurgitate uranium industry propaganda – for example former SA politicians Mike Rann and Kevin Foley have made the comparison with Saudi oil.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission could hold uranium miners and wannabes to account for peddling misinformation – but it doesn’t. Business journalists could hold the uranium industry to account − but they usually don’t.Claims that nuclear power growth in China, India and Russia will drive huge increases in uranium exports are routinely and uncritically regurgitated yet they don’t withstand the simplest calculations. For example it is routinely claimed that uranium sales to Russia will generate $1 billion annually − but Australia would need to supply entire Russian demand twice over to generate that amount of export revenue.

Milk and cream generate almost twice as much revenue as uranium − so where are the newspaper column-inches with pithy headlines about corporate ‘moovers and shakers’; where the ponderous weekend think-pieces about how the nation that once rode on a sheep’s back is now attached to a cow’s udder? Why isn’t milk the ‘new black’? (more…)

No, Australia’s uranium industry does not benefit Northern Territory Aborigines

May 6, 2013

AUSTRALIA’S URANIUM EXPORT REVENUE IN PERSPECTIVE  YELLOWCAKE FEVER Exposing the Uranium Industry’s Economic Myths , Australian Conservation Foundation“……..The Australian Uranium Association supports a  profits-based, rather than production-linked, royalty  system in the NT although such a system fails to  provide a certain, secure and assured revenue  platform for Indigenous communities. During the first  5 -10 years of a uranium mining operation, there is  a high likelihood that little or no income would be  generated under a profit-based royalty scheme,  even though there would be direct environmental  and social impacts from any such operations..  ” http://www.acfonline.org.au/sites/default/files/resources/ACF_Yellowcake_Fever.pdf


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 79 other followers